Arguing with balance in Japanese: 一方で and それに対して
By the end of this lesson you can compare two proposals and take a side without hiding the weak points of your own. The central idea is this: 一方で (ippō de) shows another side of what you just said, それに対して (sore ni taishite) sets a second option against the first on the same point, a figure gives your claim its evidence, ですから (desu kara) draws the consequence, and ても (te mo) lets you accept a limit and still choose. What counts here is how the ideas connect, not how many formal expressions you know.
Warm-up: comparing, giving an opinion, conceding
These pieces come back in this lesson, even if this is the first time you see them. 図書館はカフェより静かだと思います (toshokan wa kafe yori shizuka da to omoimasu), “I think the library is quieter than a café”, compares with より (yori) and gives an opinion with と思います (to omoimasu). 私は図書館のほうがいいと思います。なぜなら、静かだからです adds a reason: のほうが (no hō ga) marks the better of two options, and なぜなら (naze nara) … からです (kara desu) frames the reason. それに (sore ni), “besides”, adds one more point. 明日雨が降っても、海に行きます (ashita ame ga futte mo, umi ni ikimasu), “Even if it rains tomorrow, I'll go to the beach”, shows ても: the first part does not change the second.
- formal
図書館はカフェより静かだと思います。
- formal
私は図書館のほうがいいと思います。なぜなら、静かだからです。
- formal
それに、本がたくさんあるからです。
- formal
明日雨が降っても、海に行きます。
Three linking words and five for the trip
一方で (ippō de) opens a sentence with another side of what you said. それに対して (sore ni taishite) opens a sentence that sets something against it. ですから (desu kara) opens a sentence with what follows from it; among friends you will hear だから (dakara) in its place. The other five words are for the trip you will discuss: 案 (an) is a proposal, かかる (kakaru) means that something takes time or money, 疲れる (tsukareru) is “to get tired”, 運転する (unten suru) is “to drive” and 半分 (hanbun) is “half”. A figure goes straight before かかる, with no particle: 四時間かかります (yojikan kakarimasu), “it takes four hours”.
- 一方でon the other hand
- それに対してby contrast
- ですからso
- 案proposal
- かかるtake, cost
- 疲れるget tired
- 運転するdrive
- 半分half
Model: by train or by car?
Listen once without reading. Four colleagues are going to the beach, and at a short meeting two of them compare the proposals politely. 海には (umi ni wa) means “as for going to the beach”. 電車で行く案 (densha de iku an) shows how Japanese describes a noun: the plain verb and its words come before it, so this is “the proposal of going by train”. 運転する人 (unten suru hito), “the person who drives”, works the same way. 電車 (densha) is “train”, 車 (kuruma) “car”, 二時間 (nijikan) “two hours” and 四時間 “four hours”. 一人五千円 (hitori gosen en) is “five thousand yen per person”, and 四人で一万円 (yonin de ichiman en) is “ten thousand yen for the four of us”. 分かりました (wakarimashita) here means “all right”. Each speaker grants something to the other side before the group decides.
- Aformal
海には、電車で行く案と車で行く案があります。どちらがいいと思いますか。
For the beach, there's a proposal to go by train and one to go by car. Which do you think is better?
- Bformal
電車は二時間です。それに対して、車は四時間かかります。
- Aformal
電車は速いです。一方で、一人五千円かかります。
The train is fast. On the other hand, it costs five thousand yen each.
- Bformal
車はどうですか。
- Aformal
車は四人で一万円です。ですから、電車の半分です。
By car it's ten thousand yen for the four of us. So it's half the price of the train.
- Bformal
車は安いです。一方で、運転する人は疲れます。
The car is cheap. On the other hand, the person driving gets tired.
- Bformal
五千円かかっても、電車のほうがいいと思います。なぜなら、みんな休めるからです。
Even if it costs five thousand yen, I think the train is better. That's because everyone can rest.
- Aformal
分かりました。電車で行きましょう。
Another side: 一方で
Say one thing, then open a new sentence with 一方で and show another side of it. In these examples the first sentence is a strength and the second a limit: the train is fast, but it costs money. 一方で does not cancel the first sentence. Both stay true and the listener can weigh them, which is what makes an argument sound balanced. When the topic stays the same, you can leave it out, as in カフェは便利です。一方で、うるさいです. Words in the examples: 速い (hayai, fast), 安い (yasui, cheap), 便利 (benri, convenient), うるさい (urusai, noisy), 静か (shizuka, quiet) and 飲めません (nomemasen, can't drink).
電車は速いです/カフェは便利です。一方で、一人五千円かかります/うるさいです
- formal
電車は速いです。一方で、一人五千円かかります。
The train is fast. On the other hand, it costs five thousand yen each.
- formal
車は安いです。一方で、運転する人は疲れます。
The car is cheap. On the other hand, the person driving gets tired.
- formal
カフェは便利です。一方で、うるさいです。
- formal
図書館は静かです。一方で、コーヒーは飲めません。
The library is quiet. On the other hand, you can't drink coffee there.
Two options, one point: それに対して
それ (sore) points back to what you just said, and に対して (ni taishite) means “set against”. Use it to compare two things on the same point: journey time with journey time, price with price. The subject changes, and each side usually takes は (wa), as in 電車は… 車は…, because は helps to show the contrast. The comparison only works if both sides give the same kind of fact: the examples set 四人で二万円 (yonin de niman en, twenty thousand yen for four) against 四人で一万円, not a price per person against a total. 電車では (densha de wa) is “on the train”, and 一人が運転します (hitori ga unten shimasu) is “one person drives”. みんな (minna) is “everyone”.
電車は二時間です/図書館は静かです。それに対して、車は四時間かかります/カフェはうるさいです
- formal
電車は二時間です。それに対して、車は四時間かかります。
- formal
電車は四人で二万円です。それに対して、車は四人で一万円です。
By train it's twenty thousand yen for the four of us. By contrast, by car it's ten thousand.
- formal
電車では、みんな休めます。それに対して、車では、一人が運転します。
On the train, everyone can rest. By contrast, in the car, one person drives.
- formal
図書館は静かです。それに対して、カフェはうるさいです。
Which linking word fits?
The first two lines say the same thing: when two things differ on one point, 一方で and それに対して both fit, and それに対して makes the opposition sharper. The third line shows the difference. It talks about one thing, the train, and moves from speed to price, so 一方で is the word to use; それに対して would sound odd, because no second thing is compared on the same point. Do not confuse それに対して with それに: they start alike, but それに adds a point that pulls the same way, as in the fourth line. English “on the other hand” often does the work of both, so ask yourself first: am I showing another side of one thing, or setting a second thing against it? 高い (takai) is “expensive”.
一方で and それに対して suit a discussion, a presentation or a written text. Among friends you will hear something like the last line, with けど (kedo, but) and よ (yo); here it is enough to recognize it.
- formal
電車は高いです。一方で、車は安いです。
The train is expensive. On the other hand, the car is cheap.
- formal
電車は高いです。それに対して、車は安いです。
- formal
電車は速いです。一方で、一人五千円かかります。
The train is fast. On the other hand, it costs five thousand yen each.
- formal
電車は速いです。それに、みんな休めます。
- informal
電車は速いけど、高いよ。
Evidence and what follows: ですから
A claim gets stronger with a fact behind it, and the simplest evidence is a figure: two hours, five thousand yen. Give the fact, then open a new sentence with ですから and say what it means for the people involved. 着きます (tsukimasu) is “arrive”, 早く (hayaku) “early”, and 電車の半分 (densha no hanbun) “half of the train's price”.
You already know …ですから、… inside one sentence: 静かですから、ここで勉強します (shizuka desu kara, koko de benkyō shimasu), “it's quiet, so I study here”. The order here is the same, fact first and result after, except that the fact ends with a full stop and ですから opens the next sentence. Watch the direction, as both words contain から. ですから comes before the result: the car takes four hours, so the driver gets tired. からです closes the reason, as the last example shows: the driver gets tired, and the reason comes after, with the plain form かかる before から.
車は四時間かかります/電車は二時間です。ですから、運転する人は疲れます/海に早く着きます
- formal
車は四時間かかります。ですから、運転する人は疲れます。
- formal
電車は二時間です。ですから、海に早く着きます。
- formal
電車は一人五千円です。ですから、四人で二万円かかります。
The train is five thousand yen each. So for the four of us it costs twenty thousand.
- formal
車は四人で一万円です。ですから、電車の半分です。
By car it's ten thousand yen for the four of us. So it's half the price of the train.
- formal
運転する人は疲れます。車は四時間かかるからです。
The person driving gets tired. That's because the car takes four hours.
Taking a side with ても
A balanced argument still ends somewhere. Name the limit you accept with ても, then give your choice with のほうがいいと思います. かかる becomes かかって, and いる (iru, to be there) becomes いて, before も. In these sentences the limit is often already known: you are not wondering whether the train costs five thousand yen, you accept that it does and your choice stands. のに (no ni) does not fit here, because what follows it is a surprising fact, not your opinion. You can then add the reason with なぜなら…からです, as in the last example, where 休める (yasumeru) means “can rest”.
五千円かかって/四時間かかって/人がたくさんいても、電車/車/カフェのほうがいいと思います
- formal
五千円かかっても、電車のほうがいいと思います。
Even if it costs five thousand yen, I think the train is better.
- formal
四時間かかっても、車のほうがいいと思います。
- formal
人がたくさんいても、カフェのほうがいいと思います。
- formal
五千円かかっても、電車のほうがいいと思います。なぜなら、みんな休めるからです。
Even if it costs five thousand yen, I think the train is better. That's because everyone can rest.
Your turn and summary
Cover the answers. Listen to the first question and defend the train in four moves: a contrast with それに対して, a consequence with ですから, a limit with 一方で and your choice with ても. Then compare. Do the same with the second question, now arguing for the café: the order turns round, with 一方で bringing its strength and ても the limit you accept. In that answer, 図書館のほうが勉強できます (toshokan no hō ga benkyō dekimasu) means “you can study better at the library” and カフェはコーヒーがおいしいです means “cafés have good coffee”. Then try the opposite side of each: the car, or the library.
In short: 一方で shows another side, それに対して compares two things on one point, ですから gives what follows from your evidence, and ても accepts a limit before you choose.
- formal
海には、電車で行く案と車で行く案があります。どちらがいいと思いますか。
For the beach, there's a proposal to go by train and one to go by car. Which do you think is better?
- formal
電車は二時間です。それに対して、車は四時間かかります。ですから、運転する人は疲れます。一方で、電車は一人五千円かかります。五千円かかっても、電車のほうがいいと思います。
- formal
図書館で勉強する案とカフェで勉強する案があります。どちらがいいと思いますか。
There's a proposal to study at the library and one to study at a café. Which do you think is better?
- formal
図書館は静かです。それに対して、カフェはうるさいです。ですから、図書館のほうが勉強できます。一方で、カフェはコーヒーがおいしいです。人がたくさんいても、カフェのほうがいいと思います。
Next lessons
- Comparing and choosing in Japanese
- Giving an opinion with reasons in Japanese: と思います and なぜなら…からです
- How to explain the unexpected in Japanese with のに and ても
- Qualifying a position in Japanese: 必ずしも…ない and …わけではありません
- Joining a meeting in Japanese: 確認してもいいですか and 一点いいですか
- Reading opinion texts in Japanese: the claim and what it assumes
- Comparing sources in Japanese: 二つの記事では…
- Writing a recommendation in Japanese: criteria, evidence and です・ます or である
- How to negotiate a decision in Japanese: propose, object, agree